Ghislaine Maxwell’s direct protection attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and members of her household vowed to attraction the 5 responsible verdicts on intercourse trafficking and conspiracy prices as they left court docket on Wednesday, but their initiatives to very clear her face sizeable hurdles.

The challenges will in all probability heart on judicial rulings through the defense presentation that prevented Maxwell’s attorneys from putting some witnesses on the stand anonymously, and a further that prevented defense lawyers from recalling two of Maxwell’s accusers.

“We have previously begun doing work on the attractiveness, and we are assured that she will be vindicated,” Sternheim told reporters outdoors the court docket.

To triumph in any attractiveness, the workforce would need to show that Decide Alison Nathan abused her discretion or violated rules of proof. “It will be a tough speak for the protection to win on attractiveness,” mentioned New York appeals attorney Julie Rendelman. “Judge Nathan labored quite tough to seat an impartial jury, and the defendant received a good demo.”

A person space that Maxwell’s protection could test and use as grounds for attraction is no matter if the jury felt rushed in their deliberations after they had been told they would have to get the job done through New Years and force from the chance of Covid interrupting deliberations.

“Did that participate in any role in their decision-producing? At the very same time, the jury was incredibly expressive in their notes to the judge that they have been having the time they needed. The simple fact that they arrived again not responsible on one of the counts showed that they have been getting the time to go by every single piece of evidence,” Rendelman said.

A further problem to be elevated could be the part of compensation to Epstein’s victims. Forward of the demo, for occasion, Maxwell’s protection said they prepared to get in touch with officials from the Epstein Victims Payment Fund, which has awarded nearly $125m to about 150 people.

The 4 witness from Maxwell received sums of up to $5m, and Maxwell’s defense experienced prepared to introduce their statements to the fund to illuminate any inconsistencies in their testimony to the jury.

But legal professionals say that even if an appeals court docket agreed to listen to the scenario, Maxwell’s lawyers would will need to demonstrate that any violations had been product to the trial’s result.

A “harmless error” is not sufficient to overturn a conviction, Bennett Gershman, a professor at Tempo Legislation Faculty, instructed Reuters.

Appeals legal professionals could also argue as grounds for a challenge Nathan’s instruction to the jury that Maxwell could be located responsible even if she had deliberately disregarded evidence of Epstein’s wrongdoing.

Maxwell’s legal professionals may possibly also raise on charm Nathan’s ruling stopping three defense witnesses from testifying anonymously.

“There’s precedent when it arrives to sexual crimes for witnesses to have their names taken out, but there’s no precedent in the defense’s request to have their witnesses testify beneath a pseudonym, so I think Decide Nathan felt she experienced no preference but to rule them inadmissable,” Rendelman claimed.